Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal free essay sample

It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a just war, (Document B). Because of this, the US allowed the Natives on American land their independent nations as hey were the prior occupants, and their land shouldve never be taken unless they agreed to it or they were to lose it in a war. Although the United States policy sounded fair, for many years, the Natives were intentionally tricked into treaties that ceded huge amount of territory to the whites.TO pay for the stealing of the Native Americans land, US government brought up ideas like that it is their duty to make new efforts for the preservation, improvement, and civilization of the native inhabitants as in the First Annual Message to Congress of President James Monroe (Document l). As time eased, the Native American nations near the States showed progress. We will write a custom essay sample on Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In the letter of John C. Calhoun written to Henry Clay in 1820, he said that the Native tribes appear to be making gradual advances in industry and civilization.. . ND among them; the Cherokees exhibit a more favorable appearance than any other tribes of Indians (Document J). By 1825, the Cherokee Nation created schools and an agricultural basis of civilization, instead of hunting to survive. The Cherokee even invented the Cherokee alphabet (Document K). These were all signs of progress of assimilation. The Cherokee Indians and there southern tribes became more civilized and assimilated into the culture, it was more difficult for the US to take land from them, because they have learned to place a higher value upon the lands than more rude and savage tribes, as John C.Calhoun wrote to President James (Document M). Before Andrew Jackson, the IIS was trustworthy with the Native tribes. Andrew Jackson violently achieved his political goals of expanding into the west with violence. In his First Annual Message to Congress on 1829, Andrew Jackson agreed that It has long been the policy of Government to introduce among hem (Natives) the arts of civilization (Document O). But, he left hints of forced removal of Natives by saying that the United States lost no opportunity to purchase their lands and thrust them farther into the wilderness (Document O).In the full message exposed his ideas of expansion by advising the Natives to emigrate beyond the Mississippi or submit to the laws of those States, (Document O). It was not unexpected to see Andrew Jacksons purpose with the Natives. When he was still a General in 181 7, he commented about the Indians in the letters he wrote to the government officials. In his letters, he said that the Natives are the subjects of the United States and he expected that every Native American would naturally agree the removal. Document H) Finally he accomplished his goal of the removal because the Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress in 1830. The journey of Native tribes is now known as the Trail of Tears, because many Indians died from the weather and starvation on the road to the Indian Territory, today Oklahoma. Andrew Jacksons decision to remove Natives was unconstitutional. During Washingtons presidency, the Natives rights as strict nations were recognized.In 1832, Chief Justice John Marshall stated that Natives exclusive rights as a sovereign nation is not only acknowledged, but guaranteed by the United States when Georgia attempted to capture Cherokee lands in 1 832 (Document P). Andrew Jackson ignored the decision of the Supreme Court even used force to remove the tribes. This action was considered unconstitutional because he did not acknowledge the Supreme Courts authority to define the Constitution. To reach his own political goals and to fulfill his own interests in Western land, Andrew Jackson abandoned he policies of managing Native Americans that some past presidents left him.His decision to remove Natives without their consent was also unconstitutional, as many sources have shown that the Supreme Courts decision deemed it unconstitutional. Andrew Jacksons decision benefited the Americans in some way because more land was now available, but it is not hard for one to confirm that his policy in the sasss was not more a reformulation of the national policy than a change in that policy because it redirected the policy that was already in place.

Business Ethics When the Work

Business Ethics When the Work Work-life balance is a flexible working program that has become common in several organizations in the US. Some firms have introduced flexible working hours for their employees, who need to balance between family and work responsibilities. Work-life balance is a trend that has picked up in various places of work in the US. This work-life balance has an impact on relationships that employees have with each other. Workers who have children have found flexible working hours more rewarding for their careers and family lives.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Business Ethics: When the Work-Life Scales Are Unequal. specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The workplace environment is experiencing a lot of changes. Employers have realized the importance of offering their employees flexible work schedules, which help them balance between work and family life. However, the work-life balance approach is not getting support from all work ers as expected. Workers with no children and families to care for, feel that their colleagues who have families use this as a pretext to avoid performing their duties. They feel that they shoulder the burden of their absentee colleagues because they have to perform extra duties. It is difficult for working class parents, especially mothers, to balance their commitment to work and family effectively. However, some workers are very supportive of their colleagues who are forced by family circumstances to stick to flexible working hours. These workers understand the importance of their colleagues being involved in the lives of their children. A flexible work schedule makes such workers more effective. This is because of the satisfaction they get from performing their work duties and spending time with their children. Employees who are away from their work stations can be telephoned or emailed if an urgent issue that needs their input comes up at work. This has created a lot of harmony between workers, in firms which have work-life balance schedules. Many firms are finding it difficult to implement flexible work systems. Some employees do not have children but still need time to attend to their family members, who need their attention. Employees who care for their elderly parents or grandparents feel that their colleagues who have children are favored more by the work-life balance schedules than them. They claim that they also deserve to be given flexible work schedules, which allow them to care for their elderly relatives more. Human resource specialists argue that, for a flexible work program to succeed, all employees with alternative interests away from work need to be considered.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Employees in firms who offer flexible work schedules should focus on how their duties are going to be done during the period they are away. This will lessen the burden that is shouldered by their colleagues when they are away from work. Firms need to monitor the time each worker spends at the workplace, to determine every individual’s productivity level. A work-life balance program can only be effective if all employees communicate with each other easily, regardless of their locations. Workers also need to notify their colleagues if they are planning to leave their workstations early. Flexible working programs need to be fair to all workers to reduce resentment between them. Organizations need to meet crucial deadlines and performance targets. Implementation of a work-life balance program should ensure that productivity levels in the organization remain consistent. This case confirms that many firms face difficulties when implementing flexible work programs for their employees. All employees need to be given equal consideration when a flexible work program is being implemented.